"Mark Bittman, a silly and pretentious chap who writes about food
for the New York Times, weighs in with a blog post in defense of Mayor Michael
Bloomberg's widely mocked proposed ban on large sodas: 'If that's nannying, I'm
all for it. Here's the question: Who do you want taking care of your kids while
you're not looking--governments interested in improving public health, or
corporations interested in improving the bottom line at the expense of same?
'There is a maddeningly false choice being put forth by the staunchest
critics of this plan: either the government tells us what we can and cannot eat
and drink, or we exercise our unbridled freedom in making those decisions for
ourselves.'
"Notice how in the paragraph immediately preceding his complaint
about 'a maddeningly false choice,' he puts forth exactly such a false choice." We also notice how Bittman assumes Big Business has the worst motives while Big Government has the best motives. Arguments like this reveal the fascist undertones of phrases like "public health."
No comments:
Post a Comment