We have a lot of nerve clinging to our Mountain Dews and Big Gulps. Don't we know that soda is more harmful to poor people, minorities, and defenseless infants who are exposed to Pepsi ads practically from the moment they emerge from the womb? As CSPI's executive director said at the Summit, sugary drinks are responsible for "a plague." How can we hear that and not feel pangs of societal guilt as we twist the caps off our Mr. Pibb bottles?
By all accounts, the Summiteers heaped praise upon New York's Mayor Bloomberg, aka the 'Wizard of 16 Oz.,' who made big news recently with his proposed ban of large sodas, despite his public appearances at National Donut Day and competitive-hot-dog-eating events. Apparently, Bloomberg himself was not there, but New York City health commissioner Thomas Farley was; you may recall that the NYC health department produced this hyperbolic propaganda campaign which included an image of a man who was Photoshopped to look like a diabetic amputee.
Another big-city mayor was at the Summit to speak: Philadelphia Mayor
Michael A. Nutter. He told how his two attempts to tax soda were inspired by
the anti-tobacco movement, and he decried the obesity problem in African
American neighborhoods of his city, as if we should believe that soda companies
are trying to poison that population as part of a racist scheme. One of his
justifications for taxing soda is that it has no nutritional value, which is a
non-sequitur and an affront to personal choice.
However, what Mayor Nutter did a few days before the summit received
more attention than anything he said there. Reportedly, Nutter officiated at
the ribbon-cutting ceremony for a new Shake Shack restaurant. (Interestingly, Michelle
Obama has been known
to order from Shake Shack. That is, when she's not busy telling Disney,
the military,
and restaurant
chains to stop serving and advertising 'junk food'.)
The beverage industry was shut out from the summit, but a repentant
ex-Coke marketing executive named Todd Putman was given the podium to denounce
his former industry. Putman revealed the deeply guarded industry secret
that—egads!—Coke wanted to sell more soda to people. (Insert horror-movie
strings here.) Coke saw itself as competing not only against other sodas but against
all types of beverages, which is what all smart and forward-thinking businesses do in
their respective fields. Putman spins this business outlook into a sinister
plot to make sure everyone drank nothing but Coke. Of course, Coke products
include waters and diet sodas, and all the marketing in the world can't force
anyone to drink a certain beverage. Just sayin'.
Actually, life's sweeter when the government
doesn't tell you what to drink. |
It's easy to see why those with opposing
viewpoints were barred from the Soda Summit. When you take away the assumptions
that sugary drinks in and of themselves are poison, that soda drinkers across
the board should be penalized because certain individuals and groups drink more
soda than is healthy, that government is more responsible for your and your family's health than you are, that a few private industries should take the blame for the increase in
obesity, and that nanny-state politicians are "concerned," brave, and
progressive rather than grandstanding, condescending, control-hungry, and eager
to divert attention from more difficult and pressing issues, the case for
taxing or banning soda quickly goes flat.
(Hat tips to consumerfreedom.com, COPrevent.org, and marcgunther.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment