There's No Denying Their Agenda

If you still think that the food police are just objective, concerned, scientific types which no political axe to grind, this quote from Margo G. Wootan, nutrition policy director at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a self-described nonprofit consumer watchdog group, should make you think again:

“Denying the science on food marketing and childhood obesity is like denying the science on global warming or evolution, and the Administration should not retreat in the face of the baseless arguments of food-industry lobbyists.”

This kind of attack is right out of the far-left playbook: pronounce your views as being equivalent to "science," label those who disagree with you as "deniers" or "haters," insult anybody with a Bible-based worldview, and use name-calling to pressure your opponents into silence. And these words come from an "expert" who is frequently quoted in mainstream news stories about food and nutrition.

Also, has Wootan never heard of the "Climategate" scandal that's been unfolding over the last few years? I'm guessing whatever science she's referring to linking food marketing and childhood obesity is more solid than the science on global warming. And Darwin's theory is just that--a theory. To normal people, Darwinism and global warming are debatable matters, but to radical lefties they are articles of faith.

As you might guess, the CSPI is one of the head stations for the liberal food police, which has been shamelessly politicizing food for 40 years.

(Emphasis mine)